RESEARCH ARTICLE The Puerto Rican Parrot Reintroduction Program: Sustainable Management of the Aviary Population

Abstract

Joanne Earnhardt.!" Jafet Velez-Valentin.? Ricardo Valentin;' Sarah Long,4 Colleen Lynch,5 and Kate Schowe1

1 Department of Conservation and Science, Lincoln Park Zoo, Chicago, Illinois

2 US. Fish and Wildlife Service, Iguaca Aviary, Rio Grande, Puerto Rico 3 Puerto Rico Department of Natural and Environmental Resources, Ramey Station, Aguadilla, Puerto Rico

"Population Management Center, Department of Conservation and Science, Lincoln Park Zoo, Chicago, Illinois

5 Animal Care Department, Lincoln Park Zoo, Chicago, Illinois

The cornerstone of the recovery plan for the critically endangered Puerto Rican parrot (Amazona vitatta) is an actively managed, long-term reintroduction program. One captive population distributed across two aviaries in Puerto Rico is the sole source for release but its ability to persist as a managed resource has not been evaluated since 1989. We conducted an assessment for sustainable management of the aviary population while harvesting for release. To assess demographic rates such as population growth, vital rates, and age/sex structure, we compiled a studbook database on all living, dead, and released individuals in the aviary population. Using an individual-based risk assessment model we applied population specific data based on the management period from 1993 to 2012 to simulate future aviary population dynamics and evaluate future potential production. We modeled four potential management strategies to harvest parrots for proposed releases; these scenarios vary the number of parrots and the life stage. Our simulations revealed that the aviary population can be simultaneously managed for sustainability and harvesting of parrots for release. However, without cautious management, overharvesting can jeopardize sustainability of the aviary population. Our analysis of the aviary breeding program provides a rare opportunity to review progress relative to conservation program objectives after four decades of active management. The successful growth of the aviary population and its ability to serve as a sustainable source for reintroductions supports the 1973 decision to build a breeding program from a small population of 13 parrots. Zoo Biol. XX:XX-XX, 2014. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

 INTRODUCTION

Reintroduction programs for any species are risky, complex conservation actions, but these programs may be even more of a challenge when captive populations are the sole source of individuals for release [Kleiman, 1989; Seddon et al., 2007; Snyder et al., 1996; Wilson et al., 1994]. For captive populations, managers must consider changes in genetic structure, loss of behavioral competency, and sustainability of the captive population [Earnhardt, 2010; Leus and Lacy, 2009; McPhee, 2004]. Due to challenges inherent to reintroduction efforts and a need to manage wisely, scientists and managers have attempted to assess individual factors contributing to potential success or failure of a release program. Most of the species-specific case studies have focused on factors such as management of threats in the wild, methodology for releases, monitoring after releases, evaluation of release programs, and adaptive management of wild populations [Seddon et al., 2007]. Few published case studies exist evaluating sustainability for the source popula- tion (wild or captive) when individuals are harvested for release; this is true even when captive populations are the sole source for recovery [but see Coonan et al., 2010; Earnhardt et al., 2009]. The IUCN Reintroduction Guidelines [1998] and other publications caution managers against jeopardizing the sustainability of a source population [Earnhardt, 2010; Kleiman, 1989]. Sustainability, defined by Lacy [2012] as "management of the resource in a manner that does not deplete its value for the future" is a well-recognized demographic and genetic challenge for captive populations. In our study, we evaluate past progress as well as current status and generate a computer model to assess sustainability of the captive source population as it contributes to the reintroduction program of the Puerto Rican parrot (Amazona vittata), an iconic and high-profile conservation species.

Conservation actions taken on behalf of the Puerto Rican parrot have a four-decade history. At one time these parrots were abundant and widespread, estimated near 1 million birds, but due to diverse threats including habitat loss and fragmentation, the wild population declined to 13 parrots by 1975 [Snyder et al., 1987]. In 1973, managers made a decision to establish an aviary population with chicks and eggs taken from the small remaining wild population [U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1982, 1999, 2009]. The long-term management objective was to breed these birds and harvest from a future (i.e., larger) captive population for a reintroduction program. For reintroductions based on captive breeding programs, concerns exist that captive programs can (1) be costly, (2) direct funds away from habitat restoration, (3) alter genetic structure of future wild populations, (4) compromise natural behavior of the species, and (5) have low likelihood of success [Earnhardt, 2010; Griffith et al., 1989; Leus and Lacy, 2009; McPhee, 2004; Snyder et al., 1996; Wilson et al., 1994]. Yet for some highly endangered species like the Puerto Rican parrot, managers have no alternate options as a reintroduction program based on captive breeding may be the only viable recovery solution, despite the risks.

 

 

PDF

References

Araki H, Cooper B, Blouin MS. 2007. Genetic effects of captive breeding cause a rapid, cumulative fitness decline in the wild. Science 318:100-103.

Armbruster P, Reed DH. 2005. Inbreeding depression in benign and stressful environments. Heredity 95:235-242.

Ballou JD. 1983. Calculating inbreeding coefficients from pedigrees. In: Schonewald-Cox CM, Chambers SM, MacBryde B, Thomas WL, editors.

Genetics and conservation: a reference for managing wild animal and plant populations. Menlo Park, CA: The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company, Inc. p 509-520.

Ballou JD, Lees C, Faust LJ, et al. 2010. Demographic and genetic management of captive populations. In: Kleiman DG, Allen ME, Thompson KV, Baer CK, editors. Wild mammals in captivity: principles and techniques for zoo management. 2nd edition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. p 219-252.

Beissinger SR, Wunderle JM Jr, Meyers JM, Saether B-E, Engen S. 2008. Anatomy of a bottleneck: diagnosing factors limiting population growth in the Puerto Rican parrot. Ecol Monogr 78: 185-203.

Caughley G. 1994. Directions in conservation biology. J Anim Ecol 63:215-244.

Collazo JA, Krachey M, Dinsmore SJ, White TH, LlerandiRoman I. 2010. Assessment of Puerto Rican parrot demography: implication for its recovery program. Final report to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

Collazo JA, Fackler PJ, Pacifici K, et al. 2013. Optimal allocation of captive-reared Puerto Rican Parrots: decisions when divergent dynamics characterize managed populations. J Wild! Manage 77:1124-1134.

Conway WG. 2011. Buying time for wild animals with zoos. Zoo Biol 29:1-8.

Coonan TJ, Varsik A, Lynch C, Schwemm CA. 2010. Cooperative conservation: zoos and in situ captive breeding for endangered Island fox Urocyon littoralis ssp. Int Zoo Yearb 44:165-172.

Earnhardt JM. 2010. The role of captive population in reintroduction programs. In: Kleiman DG, Allen ME, Thompson KV, Baer CK, editors. Wild mammals in captivity: principles and techniques for zoo management. 2nd edition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. p 268-280.

Earnhardt JM, Bergstrom YM, Lin A, et al. 2008. ZooRisk: a risk assessment tool. Version 3.8. Chicago, IL: Lincoln Park Zoo.

Earnhardt JM, Thompson SD, Faust LJ. 2009. Extinction risk assessment for the Species Survival Plan (SSP) population of the Bali Mynah (Leucopsar rothschildi). Zoo Biol 27:1-23.

Faust LJ, Earnhardt JM, Schloss CA, Bergstrom YM. 2008.

ZooRisk: a risk assessment tool. Version 3.8 user's manual. Chicago, IL: Lincoln Park Zoo. Available online at: http://www. lpzoo.org/sites/default/files/pdf/cs/ZooRisk_Manual_3_80.pdf [Accessed May 15, 2003].

Faust LJ, Bergstrom YM, Thompson SD, Bier L. 2009. PopLink Version 2. Chicago, IL: Lincoln Park Zoo.

Faust LJ, Bier L, Schowe K. 2009. PopLink 2.1: user's manual.

Chicago, IL: Lincoln Park Zoo. Available online at: http://www. lpzoo.org/sites/default/files/pdf/cs/poplink2_ 4usermanual.pdf [Accessed May 15, 2003].

Frankham R. 2008. Genetic adaptation to captivity in species conservation programs. Mo! Ecol 17:325-333.

Frankham R, Ballou JD, Briscoe DA. 2002. Introduction to conservation genetics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Gilpin ME, Soule ME. 1986. Minimum viable populations: processes of species extinction. In: Soule ME, editor. Conservation biology: the science of scarcity and diversity. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, Inc. p 19-34.

Griffith B, Scott JM, Carpenter JW, Reed C. 1989. Translocation as a species conservation tool: status and strategy. Science 245:477-480.

IUCN/SSC RSG (International Union for the Conservation of Nature/Species Survival Commission Re-Introduction Specialist Group). 1998. Guidelines for re-introductions. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN/SSC RSG.

Keller LF, Waller DM. 2002. Inbreeding effects in wild populations.

Trends Ecol Evol 17:230-241.

Kleiman DG. 1989. Reintroduction programs. In: Kleiman D, Allen M, Thompson K, Lumpkin S, editors. Wild mammals in captivity: principles and techniques. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. p 297-314.

Lacy RC. 1995. Clarification of genetic terms and their use in the management of captive populations. Zoo Biol 14:565-577.

Lacy RC. 2012. Achieving sustainability of zoo populations. Zoo Biol 32:1-13.

Lacy RC, Ballou JD. 2002. Population Management 2000 User's Manual. Brookfield, IL: Chicago Zoological Society. Available online at: http://www.vortex9.org/manuall 16.doc [Accessed May 15, 2003].

Lacy RC, Flesness NR, Seal US. 1989. Puerto Rican parrot population viability analysis. Apple Valley, MN: Captive Breeding Specialist Group. FWS Cooperative Agreement l 4-16-0004-89-927.

Lacy RC, Alaks G, Walsh A. 1996. Hierarchical analysis of inbreeding depression in Peromyscus polionotus. Evolution 50:2187-2200.

Leus K, Lacy RC. 2009. Genetic and demographic management of conservation breeding programs oriented towards reintroduction. In: Astrid V, Christine B, Urs B, editors. Iberian Lynx ex situ Conservation: an interdisciplinary approach. Location Madrid, Spain: Fundacion Biodiversidad/ IUCN cat specialist group. p 74-84.