Knowledge and Perceptions of FDA Tobacco Regulation among U.S. Adults in 2015
Keywords:tobacco, FDA regulation, public opinion
Introduction: The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is interested in understanding the factors which influence knowledge and perceptions of the FDA as a credible source for information related to tobacco products. This study examined knowledge and beliefs about FDA regulation of tobacco products among U.S. adults in 2015.
Methods: Data was obtained from the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) Wave 5 collected from May to September 2015. Respondents (US adults) reported demographic characteristics, ever tobacco product use, knowledge of FDA tobacco product regulation, and their perception of the FDA’s qualification to regulate tobacco. T-tests and chi-square analysis was conducted to determine differences between respondents who believe the FDA was qualified to regulate tobacco products and those who do not. Logistic regression was run to determine factors associated with believing the FDA is qualified to regulate tobacco.
Results: 47.5% of US adults reported knowing that the FDA regulates tobacco products and 65.7% believed that the FDA was qualified to regulate them. Significant predictors of believing the FDA is qualified to regulate tobacco products included having a college degree, never trying an e-cig, and knowing that the FDA regulates tobacco products in the US.
Conclusions: Five years after FDA was given regulatory authority for tobacco products, less than half of U.S. adults know that FDA regulates tobacco, and two thirds believe FDA is well qualified to do so. Those with less education and those willing to try new products like e-cigs were the least likely to believe that the FDA was qualified to regulate tobacco.
https://doi.org/10.21423/jrs-v06n01p015 (DOI assigned 1/24/2019)
Analytics Recommendations for HINTS-FDA. (2016). Retrieved from https://hints.cancer.gov/#
Ashley, D. L., & Backinger, C. L. (2012). The Food and Drug Administration's regulation of tobacco: the Center for Tobacco Products' Office of Science. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 43(5 Suppl 3), S255-263. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2012.08.004
Blake, K. D., Portnoy, D. B., Kaufman, A. R., Lin, C. J., Lo, S. C., Backlund, E., . . . Hesse, B. W. (2016). Rationale, Procedures, and Response Rates for the 2015 Administration of NCI's Health Information National Trends Survey: HINTS-FDA 2015. Journal of Health Communication, 21(12), 1269-1275. doi:10.1080/10810730.2016.1242672
Boynton, M. H., Agans, R. P., Bowling, J. M., Brewer, N. T., Sutfin, E. L., Goldstein, A. O., . . . Ribisl, K. M. (2016). Understanding how perceptions of tobacco constituents and the FDA relate to effective and credible tobacco risk messaging: A national phone survey of U.S. adults, 2014-2015. BMC Public Health, 16, 516. doi:10.1186/s12889-016-3151-5
Doherty, C, Kiley, J, Tyson, A, & Jameson, B. (2015). Beyond Distrust: How Americans View Their Government. Retrieved from Pew Research Center: http://www.people-press.org/files/2015/11/11-23-2015-Governance-release.pdf
Deeming Tobacco Products To Be Subject to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as Amended by the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act; Restrictions on the Sale and Distribution of Tobacco Products and Required Warning Statements for Tobacco Products, (2016).
Fix, B. V., O'Connor, R. J., Fong, G. T., Borland, R., Cummings, K. M., & Hyland, A. (2011). Smokers' reactions to FDA regulation of tobacco products: findings from the 2009 ITC United States survey. BMC Public Health, 11, 941. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-11-941
Kaufman, A. R., Finney Rutten, L. J., Parascandola, M., Blake, K. D., & Augustson, E. M. (2015). Food and Drug Administration tobacco regulation and product judgments. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 48(4), 445-451. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2014.10.026
National Institutes of Health and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2015). Health Information National Trends Survey. Retrieved from https://hints.cancer.gov/docs/Instruments/HINTS_FDA_English_Annotated_Survey.pdf
(2014). FDA Moves To Regulate Increasingly Popular E-Cigarettes [Retrieved from http://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2014/04/24/306228616/the-fda-moves-to-regulate-increasingly-popular-e-cigarettes
Nelson, D. E., Kreps, G. L., Hesse, B. W., Croyle, R. T., Willis, G., Arora, N. K., . . . Alden, S. (2004). The Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS): development, design, and dissemination. Journal of Health Communication, 9(5), 443-460; discussion 481-444. doi:10.1080/10810730490504233
Tavernise, Sabrina. (2014). F.D.A. Will Propose New Regulations for E-Cigarettes. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/24/health/fda-will-propose-new-regulations-for-e-cigarettes.html?_r=0
Wackowski, O. A., & Delnevo, C. D. (2015). Smokers' attitudes and support for e-cigarette policies and regulation in the USA. Tobacco Control, 24(6), 543-546. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051953
Westat. (2015). Health Information National Trends Survey 4 (HINTS 4) HINTS-FDA Methodology Report. Retrieved from Rockville, MD:
By submitting content to the Journal of Regulatory Science (JRS), authors agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the JRS the right of first publication. Authors retain patent, trademark, and other intellectual property rights (including research data) and grant third parties the right to use, reproduce, and share the article according to the Creative Commons — Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International — CC BY-NC 4.0 license agreement. The JRS is an open access journal and, as a result, articles are free to use with proper acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process.
- If excerpts from other copyrighted works are included, the author(s) must obtain written permission from the copyright owners and credit the source(s) in the article.
- The publication of the submission has been approved by all co-authors and responsible authorities at the institute or organization where the work has been carried out.
- Copyright has not been breached in seeking publication of the submission.