Allergy Risk Assessment for Newly Expressed Proteins (NEPs) in Genetically Modified (GM) Plants

Authors

  • Scott McClain Syngenta, Crop Protection, LLC., Research Triangle Park, NC
  • Rod A. Herman Corteva Agriscience™, Johnston, IA
  • Emir Islamovic BASF Corporation, Research Triangle Park, NC
  • Rakesh Ranjan BASF Corporation, Research Triangle Park, NC
  • Andre Silvanovich Bayer, Crop Science Division, Chesterfield, MO
  • Ping Song Corteva Agriscience™, Johnston, IA
  • Laurie Goodwin CropLife International, Washington, DC

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21423/JRS-V09I1MCCLAIN

Keywords:

genetically modified, allergenicity assessment, food and feed, hazard, exposure, risk, core studies, supplementary studies

Abstract

Based on experience and scientific advancements over the past two decades, a revised approach for the assessment of the allergenic potential of newly expressed proteins (NEPs) in genetically modified (GM) plants is warranted. NEPs are most often not native to the crop genome, and thus regulatory reviews of the safety of GM plants include an assessment of the allergenic potential of NEPs. International standards for the assessment of allergenicity first developed in the mid-1990s required a series of characterization studies to be conducted that are, to some extent, still applicable today to the risk assessment of GM plants, with most modern versions represented in the Codex Alimentarius. This standardized guidance on allergenicity assessments, including the required characterization studies, presented two primary challenges. First, there was (and still is) no defined and accepted model (animal or in vitro) for directly testing allergy potential. Second, bioinformatic analyses were prescribed using thresholds for hazard identification that were neither universal for all allergens nor tested prior to the implementation of requirements into guidance documents. Herein, risk assessment principles are applied to structure the assessment of the allergenic potential of NEPs. This allergy risk assessment is built on a foundation of: 1) identifying hazard by assessing similarity to known allergens, and 2) assessing exposure when a hazard is identified. Supplementary studies such as IgE binding may need to be performed in special cases. These recommended revisions to current approaches to the assessment of allergy potential are designed to ensure a realistic, case-by-case approach, and consider updated molecular biology, genomics, and bioinformatic techniques that were unavailable when earlier allergy risk assessment approaches were established.

doi: 10.21423/jrs-v09i1mcclain

References

Astwood, J. D., Leach, J. N., & Fuchs, R. L. (1996). Stability of food allergens to digestion in vitro. Nature Biotechnology, 14(10), 1269-1273. https://www.doi.org/10.1038/nbt1096-1269

Bogh, K. L., & Madsen, C. B. (2016). Food Allergens: Is There a Correlation between Stability to Digestion and Allergenicity? Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 56(9), 1545-1567. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2013.779569

Codex Alimentarius Commission. (2003, 30 June-5 July). Appendix III, Guideline for the Conduct of Food Safety Assessment of Foods Derived from Recombinant-DNA Plants, and Appendix IV, Annex on the Assessment of Possible Allergenicity. Joint FAO/WHO Food Standard Programme, Twenty-fifth session. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.

Codex Alimentarius Commission. (2009). Foods derived from modern biotechnology, Second edition. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and World Health Organization, Rome. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/3/a-a1554e.pdf

Comprehensive Protein Allergen Resource. (n.d.). The COMPARE Allergen Database. Retrieved July 2019 from http://comparedatabase.org/

Constable, A., Jonas, D., Cockburn, A., Davi, A., Edwards, G., Hepburn, P., Herouet-Guicheney, C., Knowles, M., Moseley, B., Oberdorfer, R., & Samuels, F. (2007). History of safe use as applied to the safety assessment of novel foods and foods derived from genetically modified organisms. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 45(12), 2513-2525. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2007.05.028

Crevel, R. W. R., Baumert, J. L., Baka, A., Houben, G. F., Knulst, A. C., Kruizinga, A. G., Lucciolo, S., Taylor, S. L., & Madsen, C. B. (2014). Development and evolution of risk assessment for food allergens. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 67, 262-276. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2014.01.032

Delaney, B., Astwood, J. D., Cunny, H., Conn, R. E., Herouet-Guicheney, C., MacIntosh, S., Meyer, L. S., Privalle, L., Gao, Y., Mattsson, J., & Levine, M. (2008). Evaluation of protein safety in the context of agricultural biotechnology. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 46(Suppl 2), S71-S97. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2008.01.045

Ekmay, R. D., Coon, C. N., Ladics, G. S., & Herman, R. A. (2017). Allergenic potential of novel proteins - What can we learn from animal production? Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 89, 240-243. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2017.07.024

Fu, T-J., Abbott, U. R., & Hatzos, C. (2002). Digestibility of food allergens and nonallergenic proteins in simulated gastric fluid and simulated intestinal fluid - a comparative study. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 50(24), 7154-7160. https://www.doi.org/10.1021/jf020599h

Galia, E., Nicolaides, E., Horter, D., Lobenberg, R., Reppas, C., & Dressman, J. B. (1998). Evaluation of Various Dissolution Media for Predicting In Vivo Performance of Class I and II Drugs. Pharmaceutical Research, 15(5), 698-705. https://www.doi.org/10.1023/a:1011910801212

Goodman, R. E., Vieths, S., Sampson, H. A., Hill, D., Ebisawa, M., Taylor, S. L., & van Ree, R. (2008). Allergenicity assessment of genetically modified crops - what makes sense? Nature Biotechnology, 26(1), 73-81. https://www.doi.org/10.1038/nbt1343

Hammond, B., Kough, J., Herouet-Guicheney, C., & Jez, J. M. (2013). Toxicological evaluation of proteins introduced into food crops. Critical Reviews in Toxicology, 43(sup2), 25-42. https://www.doi.org/10.3109/10408444.2013.842956

Herman, R. A., Gao, Y., & Storer, N. P. (2006). Acid-induced unfolding kinetics in simulated gastric digestion of proteins. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 46(1), 93-99. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2006.05.010

Herman, R. A., & Ladics, G. S. (2018). Allergenic sensitization versus elicitation risk criteria for novel food proteins. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 94, 283-285. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2018.02.016

Herman, R. A., Storer, N. P., & Gao, Y. (2006). Digestion Assays in Allergenicity Assessment of Transgenic Proteins. Environmental Health Perspectives, 114(8), 1154-1157. https://www.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.8803

Herman, R. A., Woolhiser, M. M., Ladics, G. S., Korjagin, V. A., Schafer, B. W., Storer, N. P., Green, S. B., & Kan, L. (2007). Stability of a set of allergens and non-allergens in simulated gastric fluid. International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition, 58(2), 125-141. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/09637480601149640

L'Hocine, L., & Boye, J. I. (2007). Allergenicity of Soybean: New Developments in Identification of Allergenic Proteins, Cross-Reactivities and Hypoallergenization Technologies. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 47(2), 127-143. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/10408390600626487

Ladics, G. S., Bannon, G. A., Silvanovich, A., & Cressman, R. F. (2007). Comparison of conventional FASTA identity searches with the 80 amino acid sliding window FASTA search for the elucidation of potential identities to known allergens. Molecular Nutrition & Food Research, 51(8), 985-998. https://www.doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.200600231

McClain, S. (2017). Bioinformatic screening and detection of allergen cross‐reactive IgE‐binding epitopes. Molecular Nutrition & Food Research, 61(8), 1600676. https://www.doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.201600676

Metcalfe, D. D., Astwood, J. D., Townsend, R., Sampson, H. A., Taylor, S. L., & Fuchs, R. L. (1996). Assessment of the allergenic potential of foods derived from genetically engineered crop plants. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 36(7 supp 1), 165-186. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/10408399609527763

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2016). Genetically Engineered Crops: Experiences and Prospects. The National Academies Press.

Nordlee, J. A., Taylor, S. L., Townsend, J. A., Thomas, L. A., & Bush, R. K. (1996). Identification of a Brazil-Nut Allergen in Transgenic Soybeans. New England Journal of Medicine, 334(11), 688-692. https://www.doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199603143341103

Pearson, W. (2003). Finding protein and nucleotide similarities with FASTA. Current Protocols in Bioinformatics, 4(1), 3-9. https://www.doi.org/10.1002/0471250953.bi0309s04

Privalle, L., Bannon, G., Herman, R., Ladics, G., McClain, S., Stagg, N., Ward, J., & Herouet-Guicheney, C. (2011). Heat stability, its measurement, and its lack of utility in the assessment of the potential allergenicity of novel proteins. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 61(3), 292-295. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2011.08.009

Silvanovich, A., Bannon, G., & McClain, S. (2009). The use of E-scores to determine the quality of protein alignments. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 54}(3), S26-S31. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2009.02.004

Taylor, S. L., Gendel, S. M., Houben, G. F., & Julien, E. (2009). The Key Events Dose-Response Framework: A Foundation for Examining Variability in Elicitation Thresholds for Food Allergens. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 49(8), 729-739. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/10408390903098707

U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2016). Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS). Retrieved July 2019 from https://www.fda.gov/food/food-ingredients-packaging/generally-recognized-safe-gras

U.S. Pharmacopeia. (2000). Simulated gastric fluid, TS. In U.S. Pharmacopeia Board of Trustees (Ed.), The National Formulary 9. U.S. Pharmacopeia Convention, 2235.

Ulleberg, E. K., Comi, I., Holm, H., Herud, E. B., Jacobsen, M., & Vegarud, G. E. (2011). Human Gastrointestinal Juices Intended for Use in In Vitro Digestion Models. Food Digestion, 2(1-3), 52-61. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s13228-011-0015-4

Verhoeckx, K., Bogh, K. L., Dupont, D., Egger, L., Gadermaier, G., Larre, C., Mackie, A., Mednard, O., Adel-Patient, K., Picariello, G., Portmann, R., Smit, J., Turner, P., Untersmayr, E., & Epstein, M. M. (2019). The relevance of a digestibility evaluation in the allergenicity risk assessment of novel proteins. Opinion of a joint initiative of COST action ImpARAS and COST action INFOGEST. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 129, 405-423. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2019.04.052

World Health Organization, & Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (1996, September 30 - October 4). Joint FAO/WHO Expert Consultation on Biotechnology and Food Safety. Rome, Italy.

World Health Organization, & Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2001, January 22 - 25). Evaluation of Allergenicity of Genetically Modified Foods: Report of a Joint FAO/WHO Expert Consultation on Allergenicity of Foods Derived from Biotechnology. Rome, Italy.

Downloads

Published

2021-01-05

Most read articles by the same author(s)