Data Transportability for Studies Performed to Support an Environmental Risk Assessment for Genetically Modified (GM) Crops

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21423/JRS-V09I1BACHMAN

Keywords:

data transportability, environmental risk assessment, genetically modified plants, agroclimate

Abstract

Laboratory and field data generated on genetically modified (GM) plants in one country can inform the environmental risk assessment and support regulatory decision-making for GM plants being cultivated in another country. Well-designed studies that test clear risk hypotheses and that follow well-established methods allow for conclusions to be made about potential environmental effects from cultivation of a GM plant relative to its conventional counterparts. Following the principle of data transportability, if no biologically relevant differences between a GM plant and its conventional counterparts are observed in one country or region, data from these studies can be used to inform the risk assessment in another country, regardless of agroclimatic zone. Similarly, if biologically relevant differences are observed in studies conducted in one country, these data can be used to assess potential environmental harm in another country. Gathering additional data for the ERA in a different country or in expanded regions may increase the weight of evidence of environmental safety, but additional field study data are only warranted if specific hypotheses of risk remain after assessing risk based on the existing data, and if they would affect the outcome of decision-making. Transportation of product data across regions has been successfully used by multiple countries to eliminate redundancy, create regulatory efficiencies and enable timely realization of the benefits of GM plants.

doi: 10.21423/jrs-v09i1bachman

References

Ahmad, A., Negri, I., Oliveira, W., Brown, C., Asiimwe, P., Sammons, B., Horak, M., Jiang, C., & Carson, D. (2016). Transportable data from non-target arthropod field studies for the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified maize expressing an insecticidal double-stranded RNA. Transgenic Research, 25(1), 1-17. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s11248-015-9907-3

Anderson, J. A., Bachman, P., Burns, A., Chakravarthy, S., Goodwin, L., Privalle, L., Song, S., & Storer, N. P. (2021). Streamlining data requirements for the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified (GM) crops for cultivation approvals. Journal of Regulatory Science, 9(1), 26-37. doi: XXX

Carstens, K., Anderson, J., Bachman, P., De Schrijver, A., Dively, G., Federici, B., Hamer, M., Gielkens, M., Jensen, P., Lamp, W., Rauschen, S., Ridley, G., Romeis, J., & Waggoner, A. (2012). Genetically modified crops and aquatic ecosystems: considerations for environmental risk assessment and non-target organism testing. Transgenic Research, 21(4), 813-842. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s11248-011-9569-8

Carstens, K., Cayabyab, B., De Schrijver, A., Gadaleta, P. G., Hellmich, R. L., Romeis, J., Storer, N., Valicente, F. H., & Wach, M. (2014). Surrogate species selection for assessing potential adverse environmental impacts of genetically engineered insect-resistant plants on non-target organisms. GM Crops & Food, 5(1), 11-15. https://www.doi.org/10.4161/gmcr.26560

Chandler, S., & Dunwell, J. M. (2008). Gene flow, risk assessment and the environmental release of transgenic plants. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 27(1), 25-49. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/07352680802053916

Corrales Madrid, J. L., Martinez Carrillo, J. L., Osuna Martinez, M. B., Duran Pompa, H. A., Alonso Escobedo, J., Javier Quinones, F., Garzon Tiznado, J. A., Castro Espinoza, L., Zavala Garcia, F., Espinoza Banda, A., Gonzalez Garcia, J., Jiang, C., Brown, C. R., de la F. Martinez, J. M., Heredia Diaz, O., Whitsel, J. E., Asiimwe, P., Baltazar, B. M., & Ahmad, A. (2018). Transportability of non‐target arthropod field data for the use in environmental risk assessment of genetically modified maize in Northern Mexico. Journal of Applied Entomology, 142(5), 525-538. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/jen.12499

EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms. (2015). Guidance on the agronomic and phenotypic characterisation of genetically modified plants. EFSA Journal, 13(6). https://www.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4128

Garcia-Alonso, M., Hendley, P., Bigler, F., Mayeregger, E., Parker, R., Rubinstein, C., Satorre, E., Solari, F., & McLean, M. A. (2014). Transportability of confined field trial data for environmental risk assessment of genetically engineered plants: a conceptual framework. Transgenic Research, 23(6), 1025-1041. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s11248-014-9785-0

Goto, H., McPherson, M. A., Comstock, B. A., Stojsin, D., & Ohsawa, R. (2017). Likelihood assessment for gene flow of transgenes from imported genetically modified soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) to wild soybean (Glycine soja Seib. et Zucc.) in Japan as a component of environmental risk assessment. Breeding Science, 67(4), 348-356. https://www.doi.org/10.1270/jsbbs.16134

Goto, H., Shimada, H., Horak, M. J., Ahmad, A., Baltazar, B. M., Perez, T., McPherson, M. A., Stojsin, D., & Ohsawa, R. (2016). Characterization of natural and simulated herbivory on wild soybean (Glycine soja Seib. et Zucc.) for use in ecological risk assessment of insect protected soybean. PloS one, 11(3), e0151237. https://www.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151237

Horak, M. J., Rosenbaum, E. W., Kendrick, D. L., Sammons, B., Phillips, S. L., Nickson, T. E., Dobert, R. C., & Perez, T. (2015). Plant characterization of Roundup Ready 2 Yield® soybean, MON 89788, for use in ecological risk assessment. Transgenic Research, 24(2), 213-225. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s11248-014-9839-3

Japan Biosafety Clearing House. (2014). Biosafety regulations in Japan. Assessment of effects on biological diversity. Retrieved November 2019 from https://www.biodic.go.jp/bch/english/cartagena/s_05.html

Koeter, H. B. W. M. (2003). Mutual acceptance of data: Harmonised test methods and quality assurance of data - The process explained. Toxicology Letters, 140, 11-20. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4274(02)00491-5

Lu, B-R. (2008). Transgene escape from GM crops and potential biosafety consequences: An environmental perspective. Collection of Biosafety Reviews, 4, 66-141.

Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. (2011). Survey on GM plants in 2009 (in Japanese). Retrieved from http://www.maff.go.jp/j/syouan/nouan/carta/c_data/pdf/21kekka.pdf

Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. (2011). Survey on GM plants in 2010 (in Japanese). Retrieved from http://www.maff.go.jp/j/syouan/nouan/carta/c_data/pdf/22_natane.pdf

Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. (2012). Survey on GM plants in 2011 (in Japanese). Retrieved from http://www.maff.go.jp/j/press/syouan/nouan/pdf/120912-02.pdf

Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. (2013). Survey on GM plants in 2012 (in Japanese). Retrieved from http://www.maff.go.jp/j/syouan/nouan/carta/c_data/pdf/24_kekka.pdf

Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. (2014). Survey on GM plants in 2013} (in Japanese). Retrieved from http://www.maff.go.jp/j/syouan/nouan/carta/torikumi/pdf/h25_kekka.pdf

Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. (2015). Survey on GM plants in 2014 (in Japanese). Retrieved from http://www.maff.go.jp/j/syouan/nouan/carta/torikumi/pdf/h26_houkoku.pdf

Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. (2017). Survey on GM plants in 2015 (in Japanese). Retrieved from http://www.maff.go.jp/j/press/syouan/nouan/attach/pdf/170110-1.pdf

Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. (2018). Survey on GM plants in 2016 (in Japanese). Retrieved from http://www.maff.go.jp/j/syouan/nouan/carta/torikumi/attach/pdf/index-134.pdf

Nakai, S., Hoshikawa, K., Shimono, A., & Ohsawa, R. (2015). Transportability of confined field trial data from cultivation to import countries for environmental risk assessment of genetically modified crops. Transgenic Research, 24(6), 929-944. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s11248-015-9892-6

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2016). Low-level presence of transgenic plants in seed and grain commodities: Environmental risk/safety assessment and availability and use of information. In Safety Assessment of Transgenic Organisms in the Environment, Volume 6: OECD Consensus Documents. OECD Publishing. Retrieved from https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/9789264253421-4-en.pdf?expires=1603915225&id=id&accname=ocid177419&checksum=682F6AB550E8B0CA8B3968A8625A706D

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). Saving Costs in Chemicals Management: How the OECD Ensures Benefits to Society. OECD Publishing. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264311718-en

Raybould, A. (2007). Ecological versus ecotoxicological methods for assessing the environmental risks of transgenic crops. Plant Science, 173(6), 589-602. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2007.09.003

Romeis, J., Hellmich, R. L., Candolfi, M. P., Carstens, K., De Schrijver, A., Gatehouse, A. M. R., Herman, R. A., Huesing, J. E., McLean, M. A., Raybould, A., Shelton, A. M., & Waggoner, A. (2011). Recommendations for the design of laboratory studies on non-target arthropods for risk assessment of genetically engineered plants. Transgenic Research, 20(1), 1-22. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s11248-010-9446-x

Romeis, J., Raybould, A., Bigler, F., Candolfi, M. P., Hellmich, R. L., Huesing, J. E., & Shelton, A. M. (2013). Deriving criteria to select arthropod species for laboratory tests to assess the ecological risks from cultivating arthropod-resistant genetically engineered crops. Chemosphere, 90(3), 901-909. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.09.035

Rose, R. I. (2006). Tier-based testing for effects of proteinaceous insecticidal plant-incorporated protectants on non-target arthropods in the context of regulatory risk assessments. IOBC WPRS Bulletin, 29(5), 143-149.

Wolt, J. D., Keese, P., Raybould, A., Fitzpatrick, J. W., Burachik, M., Gray, A., Olin, S. S., Schiemann, J., Sears, M., & Wu, F. (2010). Problem formulation in the environmental risk assessment for genetically modified plants. Transgenic Research, 19(3), 425-436. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s11248-009-9321-9

Downloads

Published

2021-01-05

Most read articles by the same author(s)