He or She: Does Gender Effect Various Mode of Instructional Visual Design?

Sanju Saha, Santoshi Halder

Abstract


Learning with onscreen visual instruction environment (i.e., multimedia learning, interactive learning etc) is a growing phenomenon and inevitably its effectiveness has been established by previous researcher with their many empirical findings. Though previous research emphasized gender as an important factor influencing information processing, however, astonishingly as yet factors of gender differentiation in multimedia learning has not been taken seriously. From this orientation this article may address one of the important question that whether gender effect different modes of presentation (Static vs Animation). To unveil the question regarding gender effect, in this article various mode of instructional multimedia has been taken into consideration dexterously.. To investigate gender differentiation on different mode of visual presentation researchers have developed two different types of instructional module (Static and Animation). Total 120 students (60 male and 60 female) have been selected to implement the study with different matching criteria. MANOVA is conducted to find out the group difference in different condition. Result showed a momentous significant interaction effect between gender and different mode of presentation (Static vs Animation) showing superiority of females in static visual presentation as compared to the males. Besides, in animated presentation male students performed better than females in achievement of factual, conceptual and rules and principle knowledge domain. However, the main effect of gender was insignificant. This research result was discussed from various theoretical focal points. 


Keywords


Gender, Multimedia Instruction, Cognitive Load, Instructional visualization

Full Text:

PDF

References


References

Baddeley, A. D. (1992). Working memory. Science, 255, 556-¬559.

Barber, N. (2009). Gender Differences in Information Search: Implications for Retailing. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 6(6), 415-426.

Bonomo, V. (2010) Gender Matters in Elementary Education Research-based Strategies to Meet the Distinctive Learning Needs of Boys and Girls. Educational Horizons, 257-264.

Cowards, F.L.; Crooks, S.M.; Flores, R. & Dao, D. (2012). Examining the Effect of Gender and Presentation Mode on Learning from a Multimedia Presentation. Multidisciplinary Journal of Gender Studies, 1 (1), 48¬69.

Dong, Y., & Li, R. (2011). The reflection for multimedia teaching. Asian Social Science, 7(2), 165¬167.

Dwyer, F. M. (1978). Strategies for improving visual learning. State College, PA: Learning Services.

Grimley, M. (2007). Learning from multimedia materials: The relative

impact of individual differences. Educational Psychology, 27,

-¬485.

Halpern, D.F. (2004). A cognitive¬ process taxonomy for sex differences in cognitive abilities. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 135¬-139.

Huck, S. W. (2004). Reading statistics and research. Boston: Pearson Education.

Lin, H. & Dwyer, F. M. (2010). The effect of static and animated visualization: a perspective of instructional effectiveness and efficiency. Educational Technology Research & Development, 58(2), 155¬-174.

Lin, H. (2011). Facilitating Learning from Animated Instruction: Effectiveness of Questions and Feedback as Attention¬ directing

Strategies. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 14(2), 31-¬42.

Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia Learning. UK: Cambridge University Press.

Mayer, R.E. & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38 (1), 43¬-52.

Meyers-Levy, J. (1989). Gender differences in information processing: A selectivity interpretation, in Cafferata, P., & Tybout, A. (Eds.), Cognitive and Affective Responses to Advertising (pp. 219-260). Lexington Books, Lexington, MA.

Parette Jr., H. P., Hourcade, J., & Blum, C. (2011). Using Animation in Microsoft PowerPoint to Enhance Engagement and Learning in Young Learners With Developmental Delay. Teaching Exceptional Children, 43(4), 58-¬67.

Sweller, J., & Chandler, P. (1994). Why some material is difficult to learn. Cognition and Instruction, 12, 185¬-233.

Sweller, J., van Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 251¬-296.

Taylor, M. M., Pountney, D. D., & Malabar, I. I. (2007). Animation as an aid for the teaching of mathematical concepts. Journal of Further & Higher Education, 31(3), 249-¬261.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.