Virtual Environments (VEs): The Potentials and Challenges for Use in Cognitive Rehabilitation of Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADLs)

Leigh Lehman

Abstract


Virtual Environments (VEs): The Potentials and Challenges for Use in Cognitive Rehabilitation of Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADLs)

Keywords


rehabilitation, telerehabilitation, virtual reality, virtual environments, cognition

Full Text:

PDF

References


Parsons T. Neuropsychological Assessment using Virtual Environments: Enhanced Assessment Technology for Improved Ecological Validity. Verlag Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; 2011.

Tanelian T, Jaycox L, editors. Invisible wounds of war: Psychological and cognitive injuries, their consequences, and services to assist recovery. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Monographs; 2008.

Parsons T, McPherson S, Interrante V. Enhancing Neurocognitive Assessment Using Immersive Virtual Reality. 17th IEEE Virtual Reality Conference: Workshop on Virtual and Augmented Assistive Technology (VAAT); 2013; 2013. p. 1-7.

Jacoby M, Averbuch S, Sacher Y, Katz N, Weiss P, Kizony R. Effectiveness of Executive Functions Training Within a Virtual Supermarket for Adults With Traumatic Brain Injury: A Pilot Study. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL SYSTEMS AND REHABILITATION ENGINEERING March 2013; 21(2).

Lee JH, Ku J, Cho W, et al. A virtual reality system for the assessment and rehabilitation of the activities of daily living. Cyberpsychology & behavior : the impact of the Internet, multimedia and virtual reality on behavior and society 2003; 6(4): 383-8.

Levy C, Shivashankar H, Kotranza A, et al. Development of therapeutic grocery store to treat cognitive and emotional dysfunction in mild traumatic brain injury and post traumatic stress disorder. Prototype progress report. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2011; 3: S180.

Levy C, Dixit N, Hundersmarck T, et al. Virtual Environments for Therapeutic Solutions (VETS) mTBI/PTSD Phase II. Gainesville, FL: Department of Veterans Affairs; 2013.

Rose F, Attree E, Brooks B, Johnson D. Virtual environments in brain damage rehabilitation: A rationale from basic neuroscience. In: Giuseppe R, Wiederhold B, Molinari E, eds. Virtual environments in clinical psychology and neuroscience. Amersterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press; 1998.

Burgess P, Alderman N, Forbes C, et al. The case for the development and use of “ecologically valid” measures of executive function in experimental and clinical neuropsychology. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2006; 12: 194-209.

Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research : applications to practice. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson/Prentice Hall; 2009.

Shaffer BT, Cohen MS, Bigelow DC, Ruckenstein MJ. Validation of a disease-specific quality-of-life instrument for acoustic neuroma: the Penn Acoustic Neuroma Quality-of-Life Scale. The Laryngoscope 2010; 120(8): 1646-54.

Carlton J. Developing the draft descriptive system for the child amblyopia treatment questionnaire (CAT-qol): a mixed methods study. Health and quality of life outcomes 2013; 11(1): 174.

Prior ME, Hamzah JC, Francis JJ, et al. Pre-validation methods for developing a patient reported outcome instrument. Bmc Med Res Methodol 2011; 11.

Rand D, Katz N, Weiss PL. Evaluation of virtual shopping in the VMall: comparison of post-stroke participants to healthy control groups. Disability and rehabilitation 2007; 29(22): 1710-9.

Kroll T, Barbour R, Harris J. Using focus groups in disability research. Qualitative Health Research 2007; 17: 690-8.

Krueger R, Casey M. Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. London: Sage; 2000.

DeWalt DA, Rothrock N, Yount S, Stone AA, Group PC. Evaluation of item candidates: the PROMIS qualitative item review. Medical care 2007; 45(5 Suppl 1): S12-21.

Rand D, Rukan S, Weiss P, Katz N. Validation of the Virtual MET as an assessment tool for executive functions. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 2009; 19(4): 583-602.

Johnsen K, Raij A, Stevens A, Lind D, Lok B. The Validity of a Virtual Human Experience for Interpersonal Skills Education. SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; 2007; New York, NY: ACM Press; 2007. p. 1049-58.

Hart DL, Wang YC, Stratford PW, Mioduski JE. Computerized adaptive test for patients with knee impairments produced valid and responsive measures of function. Journal of clinical epidemiology 2008; 61(11): 1113-24.

Hart DL, Wang YC, Stratford PW, Mioduski JE. A computerized adaptive test for patients with hip impairments produced valid and responsive measures of function. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 2008; 89(11): 2129-39.

Hart DL, Wang YC, Stratford PW, Mioduski JE. Computerized adaptive test for patients with foot or ankle impairments produced valid and responsive measures of function. Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation 2008; 17(8): 1081-91.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.12922/jshp.v2i2.41

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

 JSHP is hosted by the Mary and Jeff Bell Library, at Texas A&M University- Corpus Christi.