PRONE BRIDGE VARIATIONS WITH AND WITHOUT INSTABILITY DEVICES: AN ELECTROMYOGRAPHICAL COMPARISON

Authors

  • Ronald Lee Snarr Georgia Southern University
  • Michael R Esco The University of Alabama
  • Ryan M Eckert Arizona State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12922/jshp.v5i2.119

Keywords:

Core, Suspension training, TRX, Resistance Training, performance

Abstract

Core muscle endurance training is an important component of overall health and fitness as well as sports performance. Increasing core endurance aids in a reduction of spinal injuries, increases in power transfer from the extremities, and spinal stability. Performing exercises designed to increase core muscular activity using commercial instability devices have been gaining in popularity; however research is limited on these trending apparatuses. Therefore the objective of this research was to examine the superficial abdominal wall musculature when performing plank variations with and without instability devices. To complete this study, 12 healthy males (n = 6) and females (n = 6), mean age = 23 ± 3 years, volunteered to participate. Participants performed five prone bridge, or plank, variations using a suspension device, Swissball, or stable surface in a counter-balanced design. The five exercises are as follows: traditional plank (REG), planks with either the hands (HB) or feet (FB) placed on the Swissball (HB), and planks with either the hands (HSD) or feet (FSD) placed within a suspension device. Each plank was performed twice with the arms fully extended and was held for a 5-second isometric contraction. The electromyographical (EMG) activity of the rectus abdominis (RA), external obliques (EO), and lumbo-sacral erector spinae (LSES) was recorded for each exercise. The results indicated that significant differences existed within each of the muscles examined. HB resulted in significantly greater (p < 0.05) activation of the RA (105.03 ± 50.93 %MVC) when compared to all remaining exercises. In terms of the external obliques, the FB provided significantly greater muscle activity (84.46 ± 43.73 %MVC; p < 0.05) compared to the REG, HB, and FSD. Additionally, LSES activity was demonstrated to be significantly greater (p < 0.05) than the traditional method in both variations of the Swissball planks (i.e., HB and FB). The results of the study demonstrate that planks performed with the aid of instability devices can increase muscular activation of the core musculature. Both Swissball and suspension device planks provided a significantly greater challenge when compared to the traditional method for both the RA and EO. Therefore, instability devices may be used as a progressive challenge in rehabilitation and fitness settings to increase core muscle endurance.

Author Biographies

Ronald Lee Snarr, Georgia Southern University

School of Health & Kinesiology

Michael R Esco, The University of Alabama

Department of Kinesiology

Ryan M Eckert, Arizona State University

School of Nutrition & Health Promotion

References

Anderson, K., Behm, D.G. (2005). The impact of instability resistance training on balance and stability. Sports Med. 35,43-53.

Beach, T.A.C., Howarth, S.J., Callaghan, J.P. (2008). Muscular contribution to low-back loading and stiffness during standard and suspended push-ups. Hum Movement Sci. 27,457-472.

Behm, D.G., Leonard, A.M., Young, W.B., Bonsey, W.A.C., MacKinnon, S.N. (2005). Trunk muscle electromyographic activity with unstable and unilateral exercises. J Strength Cond Res. 19(1),193-201.

Byrne, J.M., Bishop, N.S., Caines, A.M., Crane, K.A., Feaver, A.M., Pearcey, G.E. (2014). The effect of using a suspension training system on muscle activation during the performance of a front plank exercise. J Strength Cond Res. 28(11),3049-3055.

Cohen, J. (1998). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. (2nded.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.

Comfort, P., Pearson, S.J., and Mather, D. (2001). An electromyographical comparison of trunk muscle activity during isometric trunk and dynamic strengthening exercises. J Strength Cond Res. 25,149-154.

Cram, J.R., Kasman, G.S. (1998). Introduction to Surface Electromyography. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen Publishers, Inc.

Ekstrom, R.A., Donatelli, R.A., Carp, K.C. (2007). Electromyographic analysis of core, trunk, hip, and thigh muscles during 9 rehabilitation exercises. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 37,754-762.

Floyd, R.T. (2009). Manual of Structural Kinesiology. (17th ed.). New York, NY. McGraw-Hill.

Fransson, P.A., Gomez, S., Patel, M., Johansson, L. (2007). Changes in multi-segmented body movements and EMG activity while standing on firm and foam supported surfaces. Eur J Appl Physiol. 101:81-89.

Hubbard, D. (2010). Is unstable surface training advisable for healthy adults. Strength Cond J. 32,64-66.

Kibele, A., Behm, D.G. (2009). Seven weeks of instability and traditional resistance trainingeffects on strength, balance, and functional performance. J Strength Cond Res. 23,2443-2450.

Konrad, P. (2005). The ABC of EMG: A Practical Introduction to Kinesiological Electromyography. Noraxon Inc. USA.

Lehman, G.J., Hoda, W., Oliver, S. (2005). Trunk muscle activity during bridging exercises on and off a swissball. Chiropractic & Osteopathy. 13:14.

Marshall, P.W., Murphy, B.A. (2005). Core stability exercises on and off a Swiss ball. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 86,242-249.

Marshall, R., Murphy, B. (2006). Changes in muscle activity and perceived exertion during exercises performed on a Swiss ball. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 31,376-383.

McGill, S.M., Cannon, J., Anderson, J.T. (2014). Analysis of pushing exercises: Muscle activity and spine load while contrasting techniques on stable surfaces with a labile suspension strap training system. J Strength Cond Res. 28,105-116.

Mok, N.W., Yeung, E.W., Cho, J.C., Hui, S.C., Liu, K.C., Pang, C.H. (2014). Core muscle activity during suspension exercises. J Science Med Sport.18(2),189-194.

Sanatan, J.C. (2002). Stability and balance training: Performance training or circus act. Strength Cond J. 24(4),75-76.

Schilling, B.K., Falvo, M.J., Karlage, R.E., Weiss, L.W., Lohnes, C.A., Chiu, L.Z.F. (2009). Effects of unstable surface training on measures of balance in older adults. J Strength Cond Res. 23,1211-1216.

Schoffstahl, J.E., Titcomb, D.A., Kilbourne, B.F. (2010). Electromyographic response of the abdominal musculature to varying abdominal exercises. J Strength Cond Res. 24(12),3422-3426.

Snarr, R.L., Esco, M.R., Witte, E.V., Jenkins, C.T., Brannan, R.M. (2013). Electromyographic activity of rectus abdominis during a suspension push-up compared to traditional exercises. J Ex Phys. 16,1-8.

Snarr, R.L., Esco, M.R. (2014). Electromyographical comparison of plank variations performed with and without instability devices. J Strength Cond Res. 28(11),3298-3305.

Tan, S., Cao, L., Schoenfisch, W., Wang, J. (2013). Investigation of core muscle function through electromyography activities in healthy young men. J Ex Phys. 16,45-52.

Vera-Garcia, F.J., Grenier, S.G., McGill, S.M. (2000). Abdominal muscle response during curl-ups on both stable and labile surfaces. Phys Ther. 80,564-569.

Published

2017-09-15

How to Cite

Snarr, R. L., Esco, M. R., & Eckert, R. M. (2017). PRONE BRIDGE VARIATIONS WITH AND WITHOUT INSTABILITY DEVICES: AN ELECTROMYOGRAPHICAL COMPARISON. Journal of Sport and Human Performance, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.12922/jshp.v5i2.119

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles