Effects of Question Wording on Eyewitness Testimony

Authors

  • Mary-Grace Hickman Texas A&M University

Abstract

This study examined the effect of the wording of interview questions on eyewitness testimony. Participants were male and female college students (Mean age = 19.1). Participants were presented with a short video of a vehicle accident. They were then given a questionnaire consisting of six items. To study the impact of question wording on testimony, the wording of one of the items was changed between two conditions. This item asked either how fast the vehicles were traveling when they “contacted” each other, or how fast the vehicles were traveling when they “smashed into” each other. On average, participants in the “smashed into” condition reported slightly higher speed estimations than participants in the “contacted” condition. However, the difference between the two groups was not large enough to be statistically significant.

References

Clifford, B., and C. Hollin. 1981. Effects of the type of incident and the number of perpetrators on eyewitness memory. Journal of Applied Psychology. 66: 364-370.

E, L., and P. J. 2011. Loftus and Palmer Replication Crash Footage.

Forgas, J., S. Laham, and P. Vargas. 2005. Mood effects on eyewitness memory: Affective influences on susceptibility to misinformation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 41: 574-588.

Harris, R. 1973. Answering questions containing marked and unmarked adjectives and adverbs. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 97: 399-401.

Johnson, M., and M. Foley. 1984. Differentiating Fact from Fantasy: The Reliability of Children's Memory. Journal of Social Issues. 40: 33-50.

Krähenbühl, S., M. Blades, and C. Eiser. 2009. The effect of repeated questioning on children's accuracy and consistency in eyewitness testimony. Legal and Criminological Psychology. 14: 263-278.

Loftus, E. 1975. Leading questions and the eyewitness report. Cognitive Psychology. 7: 560-572.

Morgan, C., G. Hazlett, A. Doran, S. Garrett, G. Hoyt, P. Thomas, M. Baranoski, and S. Southwick. 2004. Accuracy of eyewitness memory for persons encountered during exposure to highly intense stress. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry. 27: 265-279.

Neuschatz, J., E. Preston, A. Burkett, M. Toglia, J. Lampinen, J. Neuschatz, A. Fairless, D. Lawson, R. Powers, and C. Goodsell. 2005. The effects of post -identification feedback and age on retrospective eyewitness memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 19: 435-453.

Penrod, S., and B. Cutler. 1995. Witness confidence and witness accuracy: Assessing their forensic relation. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law. 1: 817-845.

Valentine, T., and K. Maras. 2011. The effect of cross-examination on the accuracy of adult eyewitness testimony. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 25: 554-561.

Wright, D., R. Nash, and K. Wade. 2015. Encouraging eyewitnesses to falsely corroborate allegations: effects of rapport-building and incriminating evidence. Psychology, Crime & Law. 21: 648-660.

Downloads

Published

2017-06-12