A NONLINEAR AND DISPERSIVE 3D MODEL FOR COASTAL WAVES USING RADIAL BASIS FUNCTIONS
ICCE 2018 Cover Image
PDF

Supplementary Files

Conference Presentation File

How to Cite

Raoult, C., Yates, M. L., & Benoit, M. (2018). A NONLINEAR AND DISPERSIVE 3D MODEL FOR COASTAL WAVES USING RADIAL BASIS FUNCTIONS. Coastal Engineering Proceedings, 1(36), waves.83. https://doi.org/10.9753/icce.v36.waves.83

Abstract

Accurate wave propagation models are required for the design of coastal structures and the evaluation of coastal risks. Nonlinear and dispersive effects are particularly important in the nearshore environment. Two-dimensional cross-shore (2DV) wave models can be used as a preliminary step in coastal studies, but 3D models are needed to capture fully the effects of alongshore bathymetric variations, variable wave incidence, the presence of coastal or harbor structures, etc. Yates and Benoit (2015) developed a numerical model based on fully nonlinear potential flow theory. By assuming non-overturning waves, the kinematic and dynamic free surface boundary conditions are expressed as evolution equations of the free surface elevation and velocity potential, following Zakharov (1968). At each time step, the free surface vertical velocity is estimated by solving the Laplace equation for the velocity potential in the domain. Following Tian and Sato (2008), a spectral approach is used to expand the velocity potential in the vertical as a linear combination of Chebyshev polynomials. The accuracy of the 2DV model was validated with several non-breaking experimental test cases (Benoit et al., 2014; Raoult et al., 2016). Here the model is extended to 3D using scattered nodes (for flexibility) to discretize the horizontal domain. Spatial derivatives are estimated at each node using a linear combination of the function values at neighboring points using Radial Basis Functions (RBF) (Wright and Fornberg, 2006). The accuracy of the method depends on the number of neighboring nodes (Nsten) and the chosen RBF type (e.g. multiquadric, Gaussian, polyharmonic spline (PHS), thin plate spline, etc.), with associated shape factor C for some of them.
https://doi.org/10.9753/icce.v36.waves.83
PDF

References

Benoit, Raoult, Yates (2014): Fully nonlinear and dispersive modelling of surf zone waves: non-breaking tests, Coastal Engineering Proceedings, vol. 1(34), waves.15.

Raoult, Benoit, Yates (2016): Validation of a fully nonlinear and dispersive wave model with laboratory non-breaking experiments, Coastal Eng., vol. 114, pp. 194-207.

Tian, Sato (2008): A numerical model on the interaction between nearshore nonlinear waves and strong currents. Coast. Eng. J., vol. 50(4), pp. 369-395.

Vincent, Briggs (1989): Refraction-Diffraction of Irregular Wave over a Mound, J. Wat. Port Coast. Ocean Eng., vol. 115, pp. 269-284.

Whalin (1971): The limit of applicability of linear wave refraction theory in a convergence zone. Technical report, DTIC Document.

Wright, Fornberg (2006): Scattered node compact finite difference-type formulas generated from radial basis functions, J. Comp. Phys., vol. 212, pp. 99-123.

Yates, Benoit (2015): Accuracy and efficiency of two numerical methods of solving the potential flow problem for highly nonlinear and dispersive water waves, Int. J. Num. Meth. Fluids, vol. 77, pp. 616-640.

Zakharov (1968): Stability of periodic waves of finite amplitude on the surface of a deep fluid. J. Appl. Mech. Tech. Phys., vol. 9, pp. 190-194.

Authors retain copyright and grant the Proceedings right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this Proceedings.