FULLY NONLINEAR MODELING OF NEARSHORE WAVE PROPAGATION INCLUDING THE EFFECTS OF WAVE BREAKING

Christos E. Papoutsellis, Marissa L. Yates, Bruno Simon, Michel Benoit

Abstract


Nearshore wave modeling over spatial scales of several kilometers requires balancing the fine-scale modeling of physical processes with the model’s accuracy and efficiency. In this work, a fully nonlinear potential flow model is proposed as a compromise between simplified linear, weakly nonlinear or weakly dispersive models and direct CFD approaches. The core of present approach is the use of a series representation for the velocity potential. This series contains prescribed vertical functions and allows the determination of the velocity potential in terms of unknown horizontal functions. The resulting dimensionally reduced model retains the structure of the Hamiltonian water wave system Zakharov (1968), Craig & Sulem (1993), avoiding the solution of the Laplace problem for the potential. Instead, a numerically convenient linear system of horizontal equations needs to be solved at each step in the temporal evolution. No simplifications concerning the deformation of the physical boundaries are introduced, apart from the typical requirement of a smooth, non-overturning free surface and seabed. The main limitation of this formulation is its inability to account for wave breaking. The treatment of this process is the subject of the present work. Two different techniques are implemented in the present model. Simulation results are compared to laboratory measurements for two test cases: (1) shoaling and breaking of regular waves over a barred bathymetry Beji & Battjes (1993) and (2) shoaling and breaking of regular waves on a plane beach Ting & Kirby (1994).

Full Text:

PDF

References


Athanassoulis. & Papoutsellis (2017). Exact semi-separation of variables in waveguides with nonplanar boundaries. Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 473:201700. doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2017.0017

Beji & Battjes (1993). Experimental investigation of wave propagation over a bar. Coastal Engineering, ELSEVIER, 19(1–2), 151–162. doi.org/10.1016/0378-3839(93)90022-Z

Craig & Sulem (1993). Numerical Simulation of Gravity Waves. Journal of Computational Physics, ELSEVIER, 108, 73–83. doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.1993.1164

Guignard & Grilli (2001). Modeling of wave shoaling in a 2D-NWT using a spilling breaker model. In ISOPE 2001. Stavanger, Norway.

Kenned, Chen, Kirby, & Dalrymple (2000). Boussinesq modeling of wave tranformation breaking, and runup. I: 1d. Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering, 126 39–47.

Kurnia & van Groesen (2014). High order Hamiltonian water wave models with wave-breaking mechanism. Coastal Engineering, ELSEVIER, 93(1), 55–70. doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2014.08.002

Papoutsellis & Athanassoulis (2017). A new efficient Hamiltonian approach to the nonlinear water-wave problem over arbitrary bathymetry. https://arxiv.org/abs/1704.03276

Papoutsellis, Athanassoulis & Charalambopoulos (2017). Implementation of a fully nonlinear Hamiltonian Coupled-Mode Theory, and application to the interaction of solitary waves with varying bathymetry and vertical walls. Accepted in European Journal of Mechanics / B Fluids. arxiv.org/abs/1710.10847

Ting & Kirby (1994). Observation of undertow and turbulence in a laboratory surf zone. Coastal Engineering,ELSEVIER, 24(1–2), 51–80. doi.org/10.1016/0378-3839(94)90026-4

Zakharov (1968). Stability of periodic waves of finite amplitude on the surface of a deep fluid. Zhurnal Prikladnoi Mekhaniki I Tekhnicheskoi Fiziki, 9(2), 86–94.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.9753/icce.v36.waves.78