FRF WAVE TEST BED AND BATHYMETRY INVERSION

Jane McKee Smith, Spicer Bak, Tyler Hesser, Mary A. Bryant, Chris Massey

Abstract


An automated Coastal Model Test Bed has been built for the US Army Corps of Engineers Field Research Facility to evaluate coastal numerical models. In October of 2015, the test bed was expanded during a multi-investigator experiment, called BathyDuck, to evaluate two bathymetry sources: traditional survey data and bathymetry generated through the cBathy inversion algorithm using Argus video measurements. Comparisons were made between simulations using the spectral wave model STWAVE with half-hourly cBathy bathymetry and the more temporally sparse surveyed bathymetry. The simulation results using cBathy bathymetry were relatively close to those using the surveyed bathymetry. The largest differences were at the shallowest gauges within 250 m of the coast, where wave model normalized root-mean-square was approximately twice are large using the cBathy bathymetry. The nearshore errors using the cBathy input were greatest during events with wave height greater than 2 m. For this limited application, the Argus cBathy algorithm proved to be a suitable bathymetry input for nearshore wave modeling. cBathy bathymetry was easily incorporated into the modeling test bed and had the advantage of being updated on approximately the same temporal scale as the other model input conditions. cBathy has great potential for modeling applications where traditional surveys are sparse (seasonal or yearly).

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bak, S., J.M. Smith, T. Hesser, and M.A. Bryant. 2017. Initialization and setup of the costal model test bed: STWAVE, ERDC/CHL CHETN-I-93. Vicksburg, MS; U.S. Army ERDC. http://dx.doi.org/10.21079/11681/21463.

Bergsma, E.W.J., D.C. Conley, M.A. Davidson, and T.J. O’Hare. 2016. Video-based nearshore bathymetry estimation in macro-tidal environments, Mar. Geol. 274, 31-41. Doi: 10.1016/j.margeo.2016.02.001

Birkemeier, W.A., and C. Mason. 1984. The Crab: A Unique Nearshore Surveying Vehicle. J. Surv. Eng.-ASCE, 110(1), 1–7.

Blanton, B. 2008. Report for the State of North Carolina floodplan mapping project: Coastal flood analysis system. RENCI Technical Report TR-08-8. Chapel Hill, NC: Renaissance Computing Institute. http://www.renci.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/TR-08-08-small.pdf

Brodie, K.L., B. Raubenheimer, S. Elgar, R.K. Slocum, and J.E. McNinch. 2015. Lidar and pressure measurements of inner-surfzone waves and setup. J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 32(10):1945–1959.

Forte M.F., W.A. Birkemeier, and R.J. Mitchell. In prep. Nearshore Survey System Evaluation. ERDC TR-17-xx, Vicksburg, MS.

Holman, R., N. Plant, and T. Holland. 2013. cBathy: A robust algorithm for estimating nearshore bathymetry. J. Geophys. Res., 118(5), 2595-2609.

Holman, R.A., and J. Stanley. 2007. The history and technical capabilities of Argus. Coast. Eng., 54(6-7), 477-491.

Massey, T., M. E. Anderson, J. M. Smith, J. Gomez, and R. Jones. 2011. STWAVE: Steady-State Spectral Wave model user’s manual for STWAVE, Version 6.0. ERDC/CHL SR-11-1. Vicksburg, MS; U.S. Army ERDC. http://acwc.sdp.sirsi.net/client/search/asset/1005242.

Raubenheimer, B., S. Elgar, and R.T. Guza. 1998. Estimating Wave Heights from Pressure Measurements in Sand Bed, J. Waterw. Port C.-ASCE, 124(3).

Ris, R., L. Holthuijsen, J.M. Smith, N. Booij, and A. Van Dongeren. 2002. The ONR test bed for coastal and oceanic wave models. Proc., 28th International Conference on Coastal Engineering, 380-391.

Smith, J.M. 2007. Full-plane STWAVE with bottom friction: II model overview. ERDC TN-SWWRP-07-5; ERDC/CHL CHETN-I-75.Vicksburg, MS.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.9753/icce.v35.waves.22