Raul Gonzalez, Qingping Zou, Shunqi Pan


This paper presents the results from an integrated modelling system investigating the effects of a wave farm on nearshore sediment transport. Wave Hub project is a large scale demonstration site for the development of the operation of arrays of wave energy generation devices located at the southwest coast of the UK where multiple field measurements took place. The two-way coupled SWAN and ROMS models with nested modelling system were set up at the Wave Hub site and run with and without a wave farm. The model results show that the presence of the wave farm has significant impacts on the nearshore circulation, bed shear stresses and sediment transport. The morphological changes are also altered by the wave farm. The study is the key element for the wave resource characterization and environmental impact assessment of the wave farm.


wave-current interaction, renewable energy, ROMS, SWAN, sediment transport, Wave Hub

Full Text:



Booij N., Ris R.C., Holthuijsen L.H. 1999. A third generation wave model for coastal regions, part I, model description and validation, Journal of Geophysical Research 104 (C4), 7649-7666.

Bowen A. J., 1969.The generation of longshore currents on a plane beach, Journal of Marine Research, 27, 206–214.

Buscombe D.D., Scott T.M. 2008. The coastal geomorphology of north Cornwall, Wave Hub impact on seabed and shoreline processes – report [online]. Available:

Egbert G. D., Erofeeva S. Y. 2002. Efficient inverse modeling of barotropic ocean tides, Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 19, 183–204.<0183:EIMOBO>2.0.CO;2

Gonzalez-Santamaria R., Zou Q.-P. and Pan S. 2011. Two-way coupled wave and tide modelling of a wave farm, Journal of Coastal Research, SI 64, 1038–1042, ISSN 0749-0208.

Gonzalez-Santamaria R., Zou Q.-P. and Pan S. 2012. Impacts of a wave farm on waves, currents and coastal morphology, Journal of Estuaries and Coasts, SI: Renewable Ocean Energy. (under review).

Grant W.D., Madsen O.S. 1979. Combined wave and current interaction with a rough bottom, Journal of Geophysical Research, 84 (C4), 1797-1808.

Longuet-Higgins M. S., Stewart R. W. 1962. Radiation stress and mass transport in gravity waves, with application to 'surf beats', Journal of Fluid Mechanics 13 (4):481–504.

Millar D.L., Smith H.C.M., Reeve D.E. 2007. Modelling analysis of the sensitive of shoreline change to a wave farm, Ocean Engineering, 34, 884-901.

Mulligan R. P., Hay A. E., and Bowen A. J. 2008. Wave-driven circulation in a coastal bay during the landfall of a hurricane, Journal of Geophysical Research, 113, C05026, doi:10.1029/2007JC004500.

NOAA Wavewatch III. NOAA/NCEP Operational wave models. [online]. Available:

Padman L. and Erofeeva S. 2004. A barotropic inverse tidal model for the Arctic Ocean, Geophysical Research Letters, vol. 31.

Soulsby R.L., Damgaard J.S. 2005. Bedload sediment transport in coastal waters, Journal of Coastal Engineering, 52 (8), 673-689.

SWRDA - South West of England Development Agency, Wave Hub development and design phase, SWRDA Group Limited, coastal processes study report. [online]. Available:

Warner J.C., Sherwood C.R., Signell R.P., Harris C.K., Arango H.G. 2008. Development of a three dimensional, regional, coupled wave, current, and sediment transport model, Journal of Computers & Geosciences, 34, 1284-1306.

Zou Q.P. 2004. A simple model forQ random wave bottom friction and dissipation, Journal of Physical Oceanography, 34 (6), 1459-1467.<1459:ASMFRW>2.0.CO;2

Zou, Q.-P., Bowen A. J. & Hay A. E. 2006. The vertical distribution of wave shear stress in variable water depth: theory and field observations. Journal of Geophysical Research, 111 (C09032), doi:10.1029/2005JC003300.