FINAL DESIGN OF THE NAGS HEAD BEACH NOURISHMENT PROJECT USING A LONGSHORE NUMERICAL MODEL
ICCE 2012 Cover Image
PDF

Keywords

beach nourishment
shoreline evolution
longshore sediment transport
GENESIS
STWAVE
Nags Head
North Carolina

How to Cite

Kaczkowski, H. L., & Kana, T. W. (2012). FINAL DESIGN OF THE NAGS HEAD BEACH NOURISHMENT PROJECT USING A LONGSHORE NUMERICAL MODEL. Coastal Engineering Proceedings, 1(33), sediment.64. https://doi.org/10.9753/icce.v33.sediment.64

Abstract

Nags Head, located at the northeastern part of North Carolina in the U.S., has sustained chronic erosion over the past 50 years. In 2005, Coastal Science & Engineering (CSE) was retained by the town of Nags Head to develop an interim beach restoration plan. Profile volume change was used in the planning and preliminary design of the project, and longshore and cross-shore numerical models were used in the final design to refine the preliminary nourishment plan and increase potential longevity of the project. This paper focuses on the key factors of the longshore numerical model setup for the project. These include model selection, input data and parameters, model calibration, and applications under different design alternatives. The Generalized Model for Simulating Shoreline Changes (GENESIS) was used in this study to evaluate shoreline evolution under normal wave conditions during various stages of the design life following the beach nourishment project. The model was used to identify the potential occurrence of erosional hotspots and to optimize the nourishment design so that the effects of such hotspots could be avoided or minimized where possible. Model results were also used to evaluate the impact of borrow area dredging on longshore transport in the project area and the impact of nourishment on shoaling in the adjacent inlet. The project encompasses 10.11 miles (mi) (16.28 kilometers-km) of ocean shoreline, and the design nourishment volume is based on the total permitted volume of 4 million cubic yards (cy) (3 million cubic meters-m³). [Note: As-built length was 10.0 mi and volume was 4.615 million cubic yards.] The final design has fill densities varying from north to south in relation to historical erosion rates and model projections. The average fill density is 75 cubic yards per foot (cy/ft) (188 m³/m) and ranges from 38 cy/ft to 150 cy/ft (95 m³/m to 375 m³/m). In conclusion, it is shown that the numerical model selected in this study was capable of predicting the overall performance of the large scale beach nourishment project in Nags Head as well as the performance at a particular location within or adjacent to the project, and its design methods can offer guidance to future projects.
https://doi.org/10.9753/icce.v33.sediment.64
PDF

References

ACRE. 2008. Analysis of coastal processes for the Chatham south coastal between Mill Creek and Bucks Creek. Technical Report, Applied Coastal Research and Engineering Inc.

Beumel, NH, and KE Beachler. 1994. Beach nourishment design within an existing groin field at Galveston, Texas. In Proc 1994 National Conference on Beach Preservation Technology, Alternative Technologies in Beach Preservation, 13 pp.

Bodge KR, CG Creek, amd AW Raichle. 1996. Improving input wave data for use with shoreline change models. Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal and Ocean Engineering, Vol 122(5), September/October, pp 259-263.http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-950X(1996)122:5(259)

CSE. 2005 (August). Preliminary coastal engineering analyses for large-scale beach restoration at Nags Head. Technical Report for Town of Nags Head, North Carolina; Coastal Science & Engineering (CSE), Columbia (SC) and Morehead City (NC), 88 pp + three appendices.

CSE. 2011. Coastal engineering & geotechnical analyses for beach nourishment, Nags Head, North Carolina -Final Design Report for Town of Nags Head, NC. CSE, Columbia (SC), 163 pp + appendices.

Dean, RG. 2002. Beach Nourishment: Theory and Practice. World Scientific, NJ, 399 pp.

Ebersole, BA, PJ Neilans, and MW Dowd. 1996. Beach-fill performance at Folly Beach, South Carolina (1 year after construction) and evaluation of design methods. Shore & Beach, Vol 64(1), pp 11-26.

Ekphisutsuntorn, P, P Wongwises, C Chinnarasri, U Humphries, and S Vongvisessomjai. 2010. Numerical modeling of erosion for muddy coast at Bangkhuntien shoreline, Thailand. International Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering, Vol 2(4), pp 230-240.

ERDC. 2005. GENESIS modeling study of Reefball Breakwater, Miami, Florida. Letter Report, The US Army Engineering Research and Development Center.

Hanson, H. 1987. GENESIS, A Generalized Shoreline Change Model for Engineering Use. Report No. 1007, Department of Water Resources Engineering, University of Lund, Lund, Sweden, 206 pp.

Hanson, H, and NC Kraus. 1989. GENESIS, generalized model for simulating shoreline change. Tech Rept

NCDENR. 1998, 2004. Long-term average annual shoreline change study and setback factors. NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Raleigh (updated Feb 2004) [see

Ravens, TM, and KI Sitanggang. 2007. Numerical modeling and analysis of shoreline change on Galveston Island. Journal of Coastal Research, Vol 23(3), pp 699-710.http://dx.doi.org/10.2112/04-0191.1

USACE. 2000 (Sep). Final feasibility report and environmental impact statement on hurricane protection and beach erosion control: Dare County beaches (Bodie Island portion), Dare County, North Carolina. Vol I and Vol II, US Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District, South Atlantic Division, 99 pp + appendices.

Authors retain copyright and grant the Proceedings right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this Proceedings.