A Different Take on Live Cases: Decision Making Under Time Pressure

Authors

  • Kiersten M. Maryott University of Pittsburgh

Keywords:

live case, time pressure, realism

Abstract

A concern expressed with the traditional case method is an overall lack of

Author Biography

Kiersten M. Maryott, University of Pittsburgh

Marketing, Clinical Assistant Professor

References

Abston, K. A. (2014). Comparing Live and Traditional Case Studies in a Dual-Level Compensation and Benefits Course. Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning, 41, 236-237.

Abston, K. A. & Vuong, J. (2017). Training and Development: A Live Case Project. Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning, 44, 78-81.

Ancona, J.; Ross, K. A.; Wallace, T. L., & Weir, J. E. (1977). An Experiential Understanding of the Trust Dimension Using Consulting Cases to Teach Business Policy. New Horizons in Simulation Games and Experiential Learning, 4, 49-66.

Green, A. & Erdem, M. (2016). Bridging the Gap Between Academia and Industry in Hospitality: Using Real Life Case Studies. Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning, 43, 43-46.

Hoover, J. D. (1977). A

Levi, A.; Cannon, H. M. & Friesen, D. P. (2012). The Use of Data in

Markulis, P. M. (1985). The Live Case Study: Filling the Gap Between the Case Study and Experiential Exercise. Developments in Business Simulation & Experiential Exercises, 12, 168-171.

Weir, J. E. (1978). The Use of a Live Case in Teaching Organizational Theory and Management Principles to Graduate Students. Exploring Experiential Learning: Simulations and Experiential Exercises, 5, 228-234.

Downloads

Published

2018-03-12