ASSESSING SHORELINE CHANGE USING SATELLITE-DERIVED SHORELINES IN PROGRESO, YUCATÁN, MÉXICO

Gabriela Garcia-Rubio, David Huntley, Paul Russsell

Abstract


Assessment of shoreline change during a six-year period using Satellite-Derived Shorelines (SDS) was carried out in Progreso, Yucatán, México. Confidence bounds for the SDS were defined based on the deviation between quasi-simultaneous in situ shoreline measurements and SDS. The main objective of this paper is to show that optical satellite images are a valuable resource to study shoreline change covering large geographical scales (>10km), as well as short (<1 month) and long (>5 years) temporal scales. This approach can be particularly useful for those areas with a lack of shoreline records. The results presented here show that detection of differences between seasons and years is achievable using SDS. Furthermore, rates of change are also possible to assess.

Keywords


coastal monitoring; satellite optical images; coastal erosion; coastal management

References


Christian M. Appendini, Paulo Salles, E. Tonatiuh Mendoza, José López and Alec Torres-Freyermuth. 2012. Longshore Sediment Transport on the Northern Coast of the Yucatán Peninsula, Journal and Coastal Research. In-Press. AXIS. 2008. Reporte de resultados de las campa-as de monitoreo realizadas como parte del programa de seguimiento del proyecto: Estabilización de la duna costera mediante tubos geotextiles, para industria salinera de Yucatán, S.A de C.V., en las Coloradas, Yuc. Technical report, AXIS.

Chen, L. and Rau, J. Y. 1998. Detection of shoreline changes for tideland areas using multi-temporal satellite images, International Journal of Remote Sensing 19(17), 3383–3397.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/014311698214055

Crowell, M., Leatherman, S. P. and Buckley, M. K. 1991. Historical shoreline change: Error analysis and mapping accuracy, Journal of Coastal Research 7(3), 839–852.

Dinesh-Kumar, P. K., Gopinath, G., Laluraj, C., Seralathan, P. and Mitra, D. 2007. Change Detection Studies of Sagar Island, India, using Indian Remote Sensing Satellite 1c Linear Imaging Self-Scan Sensor III Data, Journal of Coastal Research 23(6), 1498–1502.http://dx.doi.org/10.2112/05-0599.1

Douglas, B., Kearney, M. S. and Leatherman, S. P. 2001. Sea Level Rise: History and Consequences, International Geophysics Series 75.

FitzGerald, D. M., Fenster, M. S., Argow, B. and Buynevich, I. V. 2008. Coastal impacts due to sea-level rise, Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 36, 601–647.http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.earth.35.031306.140139

Foody, G.M., Muslim, A.M. and Atkinson, P.M. 2005. Super-resolution mapping of the waterline from remotely sensed data, International Journal of Remote Sensing. 26(24), 5381–5392.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01431160500213292

Frihy, O. and Lotfy, M. F. 1997. Shoreline changes and beach-sand sorting along the northern Sinai coast of Egypt, Geo-Marine Letters 17, 140–146.http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s003670050019

García-Rubio, Gabriela. Evaluation of Shoreline Change using Optical Satellite Images, Case Study of Progreso, Yucatán. PhD thesis. University of Plymouth, United Kingdom.

Gutierrez, B. T., Plant, N. G. and Thieler, E. R. 2011. A bayesian network to predict coastal vulnerability to sea level rise, Journal of Geophysical Research. 116, 1–15.http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010JF001891

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 1990. Policymaker's: Summary of the Potential Impacts of Climate Change report from working group II to the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Technical report, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

Komar. 1998. Beach Processes and Sedimentation. 2nd edition. Prentice-Hall, USA, 544 pp.

Leatherman, S. and Douglas, B. 2003. Sea level and coastal erosion require large scale monitoring, American Geophysical Union 84(2), 13–20.

Li, R., Di, K. and Ma, R. 2003. 3-D Shoreline Extraction from IKONOS Satellite Imagery, Marine Geodesy 26, 107–115.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01490410306699

Li, R., Deshpande, S., Niu, X., Zhou, F., Di, K. and Wu, D. 2008. Geometric integration of aerial and high-resolution satellite imagery and application in shoreline mapping, Marine Geodesy 31, 143–159.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01490410802265310

Liu, H. and Jezek, K. 2004. Automated extraction of coastline from satellite imagery by integrating Canny edge detection and locally adaptive thresholding methods, International Journal of Remote Sensing 25(5), 937–958.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0143116031000139890

Mari-o-Tapia, I. 2010. pers.comm., CINVESTAV-Merida, Researcher from Oceanography Physics in CINVESTAV-Merida.

Mason, D., Davenport, I. and Robinson, G. 1995. Construction of an inter-tidal digital elevation model by the water-line method, Geophysical Research Letters 22(23), 3187–3190.http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/95GL03168

Meyer-Arendt, K. J. 2001. Recreational development and shoreline modification along the north coast of Yucatán, México, Tourism Geographies 3(1), 87–104.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14616680010008720

Muslim, A.M., Foody, G.M. and Atkinson, P.M. 2006. Localized soft classification for super-resolution mapping of the shoreline, International Journal of Remote Sensing 27(11), 2271–2285.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01431160500396741

National Hurricane Center (NHC). 1988. Hurricane Gil. Technical report, National Weather Advice, NOAA.

National Hurricane Center (NHC). 2010. Weather National Advicer, NOAA,

Robinson, I. S. 2004. Measuring the Oceans from Space. The principles and methods of satellite oceanography, Springer, Praxis, Germany.

Vitousek, P. M., Mooney, H. A., Lubchenco, J. and Melillo, J. M. 1997. Human Domination of Earth's Ecosystems, Science 277(5325), 494–499.http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.277.5325.494

Wang, C., Zhang, J. and Ma, Y. 2010. Coastline interpretation from multispectral remote sensing images using an association rule algorithm, Int. J. Remote Sensing 31(24), 6409–6423.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01431160903413739

White, K. and El-Asmar, H. M. 1999. Monitoring changing position of coastlines using Thematic Mapper imagery, an example from the Nile Delta, Geomorphology 29, 93–105.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-555X(99)00008-2


Full Text: PDF

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.