CURRENT CHARACTERISTICS IN THE PRESENCE OF NEAR-ORTHOGONAL WAVES
ICCE 2012 Cover Image
PDF

Keywords

wave-current interaction
boundary layer flow
bottom roughness

How to Cite

Lim, K. Y., Madsen, O. S., & Cheong, H. F. (2012). CURRENT CHARACTERISTICS IN THE PRESENCE OF NEAR-ORTHOGONAL WAVES. Coastal Engineering Proceedings, 1(33), currents.41. https://doi.org/10.9753/icce.v33.currents.41

Abstract

An experimental study involving near-orthogonal wave-current interaction in a wave basin is reported in this paper. Due to previous shortcomings associated with 2D bottom configurations, i.e. occurrence of ripple-induced turning of flows close to the bed, the present experiments were conducted with the bottom covered by closely packed ceramic marbles (mean diameter of 1.25cm). Three types of flows were generated over this bottom: current-alone, wave-alone and combined wave-current flow. For current-alone and wave-current cases, the log-profile analysis was used to resolve the equivalent Nikuradse sand grain roughness, kn, while the energy dissipation method was used to estimate kn for wave-alone case. The results show that kn obtained for current- and wave-alone tests is roughly 2.2 times the diameter of the marbles. For orthogonal wave-current flows, the kn value, when used in combination with the Grant-Madsen (GM) model to reproduce the experimental apparent roughness, is found to be smaller than the measured current-alone and wave-alone kn. Similar under-prediction of bottom roughness is also observed when the GM model is compared with a numerical study, thus supporting the conjecture that when the current is weak compared to the waves, simple theoretical models like GM are not sufficiently sensitive to the angle of wave-current interaction. Experiments with currents at angles of 60° and 120° to the wave direction yield apparent roughness smaller than the 90° case, which is counter-intuitive since one would expect the mean flow to experience a stronger wave-induced turbulence when it is more aligned with the wave direction. This result indicates a possible contamination from wave-induced mass transport to the mean flow profile for non-orthogonal combined flow cases, and therefore highlights the need for other alternatives to the log-profile analysis when attempting to resolve kn from current velocity profiles from combined wave-current flows.
https://doi.org/10.9753/icce.v33.currents.41
PDF

References

Barrantes, A.I., O.S. Madsen. 2000. Near-bottom flow and flow resistance for currents obliquely incident to two-dimensional roughness elements. Journal of Geophysical Research, 105(C11), 26,253-26,264.http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2000JC900132

Davies, A.G., R.L. Soulsby, H.L. King. 1988. A numerical model of the combined wave and current bottom boundary layer. Journal of Geophysical Research, 93(C1), 491-508.http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/JC093iC01p00491

Grant, W.D., O.S. Madsen. 1986. The continental shelf bottom boundary layer. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 18, 265-305.http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fl.18.010186.001405

Havinga, F.J. 1992. Sediment Concentration and Sediment Transport in Case of Irregular Non- Breaking Waves with a Current. Part E. Technical Report. Delft University of Technology, Netherlands.

Klopman, G. 1994. Vertical structure of the flow due to waves and currents. Delft Hydraulics Progress Report H 840.30, Part II.

Longuet-Higgins, M. S. 1953. Mass transport in water waves. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 245, 535-581.

Madsen, O.S. 1993. Sediment Transport on the Shelf. Draft document, Ralph M. Parsons Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, M.A.

Madsen, O. S. 1994. Spectral wave-current bottom boundary layer flows. Proceedings 24th International Conference on Coastal Engineering, ASCE, 384-398.

Madsen, O.S., S. Kularatne, H.F. Cheong. 2008. Experiments on bottom roughness experienced by currents perpendicular to waves. Proceedings 31st International Conference on Coastal Engineering, ASCE, 1, 845-853.

Madsen, O.S., A.S. Negara, K.Y. Lim, H.F. Cheong. 2010. Near-bottom flow characteristics of currents at arbitrary angle to 2D ripples. Proceedings 32nd International Conference on Coastal Engineering, ASCE, Paper #: Current. 36

Mathisen, P.P., O.S. Madsen. 1996. Waves and currents over a fixed rippled bed: 1. Bottom roughness experienced by waves in the presence and absence of currents. Journal of Geophysical Research, 101(C7), 16533-16542.http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/96JC00954

Musumeci, R. E., L. Cavallaro, E. Foti, P. Scandura, P. Blondeaux. 2006. Waves plus currents crossing at a right angle: Experimental investigation. Journal of Geophysical Research, 111, C07019, doi:10.1029/2005JC002933.http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005JC002933

Negara. A.S. 2009. Experimental study of turbulent current over fixed 2D and 3D bottom roughness. M. Eng. Thesis, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, National University of Singapore.

Schlichting, H. 1960. Boundary Layer Theory, fourth edition. McGraw-Hill, New York.

Yuan, J., O.S. Madsen, E.S. Chan. 2012. Experimental study of turbulent oscillatory boundary layers in a new oscillatory water tunnel. Proceedings 33rd International Conference on Coastal Engineering, ASCE.

Authors retain copyright and grant the Proceedings right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this Proceedings.