Keywords
articulated coastal revetment
wave loading
How to Cite
Abstract
Articulated coastal revetments (ACRs) are armoring options for abating earthen levee wave erosion. Stability criteria for ACR design typically allow initial, minor damage during design wave loading conditions (USACE, 2006). Minor wave damages may worsen progressively if not repaired before another design wave loading event. If minor ACR damages evolve under wave action to the point of unraveling, the underlying levee will become exposed to wave forces that could result in breaching (Pilarczyk, 1998). Vulnerability exists in this scenario for catastrophic flood risk management system failure. Current ACR stability limits for maintaining structural integrity under wave attack exist between the thresholds of structure incipient motion and that of initial damage criteria. Using an ACR stability limit that maintains structural integrity would greatly reduce the potential of repeat damage resulting in armor failure. A design challenge exists due to a knowledge gap in detecting and analyzing ACR performance between the thresholds of incipient motion and initial damage (Herbich, 1999). In this research, the threshold of incipient motion for ACRs is explored through small-scale experimentation. Data analysis, including correlations between hydrodynamic forcings and structure responses, extended our understanding of ACR system behavior in specific structural configurations and wave loading conditions.References
ASCE. 2003. Advances in coastal structure design. Ocean Engineering Committee, Rubble Mound and Breakwater Committee, and Coastal Practice Committee of Coasts, Oceans, Ports, and Rivers Institute of ASCE, Reston, Virginia, 220 pp.
Bonneton, P. 2004. Wave celerity in the inner surf zone. Proceedings, 29th International Conference on Coastal Engineering. 1, 392-401.
Herbich, J. 1999. Handbook of coastal engineering. McGraw-Hill, New York, New York, 1152 pp.
Hughes, S.A. 2008. Combined wave and surge overtopping of levees: flow hydrodynamics and articulated concrete mat stability. ERDC/CHL TR-08-10, ERDC, Vicksburg, Mississippi.
McConnell, K. 1998. Revetment systems against wave attack - A design manual. Thomas Telford Publishing, London, England, 162 pp.http://dx.doi.org/10.1680/rsawa.27060
Pilarczyk, K.W. 1998. Dikes and revetments: Design, maintenance, and safety assessment. Balkema Publishing, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Russo, E.J. 2003. Evaluation of bank line revetment alternatives to abate ship wake erosion. Independent Study, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana.
Svendsen, I., Qin, W., and Ebersole, B. 2003. Modeling waves and currents at the LSTF and other laboratory facilities. Coastal Engineering. 50, 19-45.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3839(03)00077-2
Terzaghi, K., Peck, R., and Mesri, G. 1996. Soil mechanics in engineering practice. 3 rd Edition, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, New York, 549 pp.
USACE. 1989. Stability of articulated concrete mattresses for Herbert Hoover dike improvements, Lake Okeechobee, FL. Technical Report CERC-89-12, Waterways Experiment Station, Coastal Engineering Research Center, Vicksburg, Mississippi.
USACE. 2006. Coastal Engineering Manual. USACE, Washington, D.C.
USACE. 2008. Photograph of earthen levee slope vegetation and embankment soil loss, Lake Pontchartrain and Vicinity HSDRRS, Louisiana. USACE, New Orleans District, New Orleans, Louisiana.