MULTI-DIMENSIONAL ERROR ANALYSIS OF NEARSHORE WAVE MODELING TOOLS, WITH APPLICATION TOWARD DATA-DRIVEN BOUNDARY CORRECTION

Boyang Jiang, James Kaihatu

Abstract


As the forecasting models become more sophisticated in their physics and possible depictions of the nearshore hydrodynamics, they also become increasingly sensitive to errors in the inputs, such as errors in the specification of boundary information (lateral boundary conditions, initial boundary conditions, etc). Evaluation of the errors on the boundary is less straightforward, and is the subject of this study. The model under investigation herein is the Delft3D modeling suite, developed at Deltares (formerly Delft Hydraulics) in Delft, the Netherlands. Coupling of the wave (SWAN) and hydrodynamic (FLOW) model requires care at the lateral boundaries in order to balance run time and error growth. To this extent, we will use perturbation method and spatio-temporal analysis method such as Empirical Orthogonal Function (EOF) analysis to determine the various scales of motion in the flow field and the extent of their response to imposed boundary errors.

Keywords


Modeling; Sensitivity; Delft3D; Empirical Orthogonal Function Analysis

References


Adrian, R.J., K.T. Christensen, and Z.-C. Liu. 2000. Analysis and interpretation of instantaneous turbulent velocity fields. Experiments in Fluids, 29, 275 – 290. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s003489900087

Davis, R.E. 1976. Predictability of sea surface temperature and sea level pressure anomalies over the North Pacific Ocean. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 6, 249-266. http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1976)006<0249:POSSTA>2.0.CO;2

Kaihatu, J.M., R.A. Handler, G.O. Marmorino, J.A. Roelvink, and L.K. Shay. 1998. Empirical orthogonal function analysis of ocean surface current using complex and real – vector methods, Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 15, 927-941. http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1998)015<0927:EOFAOO>2.0.CO;2

Morris, B.J. 2001. Nearshore wave and current dynamics. Ph.D. dissertation, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA, 89p.

Narayanan, C., V.N. Rama Rao, and J.M. Kaihatu. 2004. Model parameterization and experimental design issues in nearshore bathymetry inversion. J. Geophys, Res, 109, doi: 1. 1029/2002JC001756.

Plant, N.G., K.L. Edwards, J.M. Kaihatu, J. Veeramony, L. Hsu, and K.T. Holland. 2009. The effect of bathymetric filtering on nearshore process model results. Coastal Engineering, 56, 484-493. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2008.10.010

Raffel, M., C.E. Willert, and J. Kompenhans. 1998. Particle image velocimetry: A practical guide, Springer, New York, NY.

Roelvink, D., and D.J. Walstra. 2004. Keeping it simple by using complex models, Advances in Hydroscience and Engineering, Vol. VI, 1-11.

Zhou J., R.J. Adrian, and S. Balachandar. 1996. Autogeneration of near-wall vertical structures in channel flow. Phys Fluids, 8, 288 – 290. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.868838


Full Text: PDF

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.